There’s another way to do it where you assign a combination of placements on the weighting scale to each ball and determinate the odd one and it’s nature from these. That method can also be generalised into answering the question “Given n balls and k weightings, when is the answer to the riddle ‘yes’?”

Mathematicians have been afraid of tackling infinity for centuries, and then one guy came along and started playing with it, and showed that:
- there are exactly as many even numbers as there are whole numbers (even though logically there should only be half as many)
- there are exactly as many rational numbers (fractions) as there are whole numbers!
- there are MORE real numbers than rational numbers

No wonder everybody gets freaked out by infinity :p

And as for the ball weighing riddle – I’m not sure what you mean by your question. If by elimination you mean trying every single possibility until I came across the right one then no, I didn’t use elimination. If you mean saying “ok, let’s say I put this many balls on each scale. What do I do if one scale is heavier than the other? Mmm ok. And what do I do if they’re the same?”… then yes, I did use elimination.

Did that answer your question at all?

Infinity is such a weird thing ~~

Btw Vlad, remember your old “Why I love mathematics[...]” post? Well, recently we were discussing riddles on a Starcraft forums I visit often, so I threw your ball weighting riddle at them. Quite surprisingly for me, one guy came up with an answer that was WAY different from my own. So I got a little curious, did you go by a process of elimination for your solution? Or some kind of system to give the balls identity?